Multi-location & multi-entity reporting

Built to scale with you, one login at a time.

Multi-entity, multi-location management with a shared chart of accounts and role-based permissions — compare locations side by side, or consolidate them into one report.

Get Started See it side by side

Three locations, one number — and the three behind it.

Prime cost for every restaurant in the group, plus the consolidated figure, without opening three separate sets of books to assemble it.

Location 1

58.2%

prime cost, vs. last period

Location 2

51.4%

prime cost, vs. last period

Location 3

56.7%

prime cost, vs. last period

Group consolidated

55.4%

prime cost, vs. last period

What running more than one restaurant actually requires

Role-based access as your team grows.

An area manager sees their region, a GM sees their restaurant, and the owner sees everything — without anyone maintaining a stripped-down copy for each.

Non-restaurant entities in the same set of books.

A management company, commissary, or real estate holding entity belongs in your consolidated picture without needing GL-level restaurant cost breakdown.

Side by side or consolidated — same data, two questions.

Compare locations when you're asking which one needs attention, and consolidate when you're asking how the business as a whole is doing.

A shared chart of accounts, so the comparison means something.

Locations are measured against the same account structure and the same cost categories — otherwise comparing them is comparing two different bookkeeping habits.

One login across your entire restaurant group.

Every location in one system, rather than a separate login, a separate file, and a separate export for each restaurant you run.

A consolidated P&L should be a view, not a project.

For most growing groups, consolidation is a monthly assembly job: export each location, paste it into a master spreadsheet, reconcile the account names that drifted apart, and hope nobody fat-fingered a row. The result is a number that arrives late and that nobody entirely trusts.

DishBooks keeps every location and entity on one shared chart of accounts from the start, so the consolidated view is just a different lens on data that's already current. Comparing locations and rolling them up are the same operation — no export, no reassembly, and no drift between the group number and the restaurants underneath it.

Get Started

Side by side

The comparison that tells you where to look first.

One blended group number can hide the location that actually needs attention. Side by side, the outlier is obvious in a glance.

Metric

Location 1

Location 2

Prime cost

58.2%

51.4%

Labor

29.4%

24.1%

Net profit

12.6%

9.8%

Ask DEX

Ask across the whole group, not one location at a time.

What changes when the group is one system

Growing shouldn't mean adding a spreadsheet per restaurant.

Open a second location without starting a second set of books.
See which restaurant is carrying the group and which is dragging it, in one view.
Hand a lender or investor a consolidated P&L without assembling it first.
Give an area manager their locations without giving them the whole group.
Keep management and holding entities inside the same consolidated picture.
Compare this location to that one on identical categories, not approximations.

Built to scale with you, one login at a time.

Three locations, one number — and the three behind it.

What running more than one restaurant actually requires

A consolidated P&L should be a view, not a project.

The comparison that tells you where to look first.

Ask across the whole group, not one location at a time.

What changes when the group is one system

Side-by-side comparison